Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: Stakeholders, Authorities and Procedural Justice
نویسندگان
چکیده
Successful management of environmental quality via regulation by federal, state and local governments depends on citizen and stakeholder support. Without it, limited capabilities for enforcing compliance from unwilling citizens and legislative action to overturn unpopular regulations would doom attempts to regulate. Increasingly, public agencies responsible for formulating environmental regulations are involving citizens and stakeholders at various stages of the rule-making process; collaborative processes have become the current buzzword. In addition to satisfying legal requirements for public participation (e.g., NEPA), rule-making agencies also hope that involving those who are to be regulated in setting the rules will lead both to the development of substantively better rules and to better public support once the rules are promulgated.
منابع مشابه
مرجع صالح برای رسیدگی به دعوای مسئولیت بطرفیت دولت
Apart from believe to be conflict or comfortability between nations and government, having regard to developing of Government functions, it is shown increasing of taking decisions and acts by government. These decisions and acts may both meet missions of government and provide with advance and improve for people and country, while could be caused damages and loss for some people and could re...
متن کاملStakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist
Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all people with well-justified, reasonable reasons to endorse the decisions. ...
متن کاملWhat is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision - making ?
The concept of natural justice comprises certain legal principles that, taken together, constitute procedural fairness in administrative decision-making. It is closely aligned to the notion of public participation, a key element of most environmental impact assessment (EIA) throughout the world. But is natural justice the same as public participation, and if not, what are the differences betwee...
متن کاملProcedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law
My goal is to discuss the findings of recent research exploring why people obey the law. I am a psychologist and will focus directly on microlevel issues concerning the psychology of the person. In particular, I will explore research examining naturally occurring attitudes, values, and behaviors. I will do so by considering studies based upon interviews with citizens. I want to make four basic ...
متن کاملOn the psychology of procedural justice: reactions to procedures of ingroup vs. outgroup authorities
Theorizing on procedural justice has assumed that people’s reactions to outgroup authorities are to a large extent based on instrumental concerns. Therefore, attention is primarily directed to outcomes rather than procedures in encounters with outgroup authorities. In the current article we propose that in order for people dealing with outgroup authorities to be strongly affected by procedural ...
متن کامل